![]() I've never heard of anyone experiencing a failure using the 40 magazines, but if that's the way Sig designed them, and it makes sense for a single stack magazine, then I'm going with what's behind door number 1. On poor man Saturdays, when I have to shoot 40 cal obviously I have to break out the 40 magazines, along with the barrel. ![]() Range? I'd have no problem, but I already have 5. To me it's not worth it if your life is on the line. 357 magazines absolutely no side to side movement. 357 rounds had an ever so slight side to side movement in the 40 cal mags at the end. What I was able to determine was, the 40 rounds fit perfectly in the 40 cal mags, without any side to side movement. I think so, BUT I would only do it for the range.D dhoomonyou Registered Joined 2,964 Posts 2 Better to have a gun and not need one than to need a gun and not have one. But the second shot from the second magazine I felt an ever so slight hesitation. I own a G19 and G26, so I have no idea whether or not theres a size difference (width of mag and whatnot) between the 9mm and 40S&W Glock. 357 Sig rounds fed without a failure from the 40 cal mags. I posted this same question when I was transitioning. 357 Sig Id absolutely go with that magazine. But as bblr suggested if you're going to be carrying. My P239's all began life as 40's, but had a. It's designed to keep the round better aligned for feeding.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |